manupatra roundup

Legislative and Regulatory Update

You now have the option of customizing your manupatra round-up .This means that you get updates on the areas of interest that you select .You may change your preferences at any time you wish to. If you do not customize your round up you will continue to get the updates on all areas

 

To customize your round-up now click here.

_____________________________________________________________________

India Centric Online Legal & Business Database

Bringing forth new efficiency and unparalleled results to research efforts.

In This Issue

[No.118]                                                                            April 10, 2005

Supreme Court
High Courts
Telecom Regulatory Authority of India
RBI
SEBI
Ministry of Power
Ministry of Commerce & Industry
Ministry of Finance
Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution
International

To keep you informed about the latest Legislative and Regulatory information manupatra.com publishes this e-roundup highlighting the recent changes brought about by the Notifications/Acts/Bills /Ordinances etc.

About manupatra.com

../ provides comprehensive and easy to use legal and related information over the Internet .Our database covers Central Laws , Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court (full text of the judgments from 1950 onwards ), Orders of Tribunals , Bills , Notifications, Circulars and more

Key features of manupatra are

Content is derived from reliable primary and secondary sources
Database is updated on a daily basis
Electronic Ready Reckoner to view the judgments under a particular section of an Act / Subject
Powerful search engine with user friendly interfaces
Search in any one court/year or multiple courts/year
Hyper-linking of documents

Updated modules on WTO, Anti Dumping, Arbitration, Investment Destinations Abroad, Capital Markets, Taxation, Environment, Cyber & IT Laws, IPR, Corporate Laws, Industrial Policies, Foreign Trade, Forex & Banking and more

 

 

For subscription to manupatra.com or for more details please log onto ../ or call us at 0120 2531811 or send an email to : contact@manupatra.com

If at any stage you wish to stop receiving the e-roundup please click here to unsubscribe.

Supreme Court

 MANU/SC/0260/2005
  • Bhagwati Oxygen Limited. Vs. Hindustan Copper Limited.

Appellant herein entered into an agreement for setting up an oxygen plant for supply of oxygen to the respondent, an agreement was entered into between the parties whereby the modalities were fixed. Since a dispute arose between the parties, arbitration clause was invoked. An award was passed in favour of the appellant herein, the same was challenged by the respondent. The matter was remitted back to the arbitrator for fresh consideration. A division bench of the High Court maintained the order of the single judge.

In appeal the Apex Court, remarked that an award passed by an arbitrator can be set aside only on the grounds specified in the Arbitration Act, 1940, it is not open to a court to reappreciate the entire evidence. It was held that when awarding interest, the powers of the arbitrator are not regulated by the civil procedure code, 1908.

  • Ranjitsing Brahmajeetsing Sharma Vs. State of Maharashtra and another

The appellant a former commissioner of police, Mumbai was arrested on allegations of involvement in the counterfeit stamps and forgery case. Even though disciplinary proceedings were initiated against him while he was in service, no further action was taken and he was allowed to retire. After his retirement, he was arrested, since bail application was consistently dismissed up till the High Court. An appeal was filed before the Apex Court.

The case involved interpretation and application of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 (MCOCA), it was considered whether a prima facie case indicating culpable involvement of the accused had been established.

The Apex Court, allowed interim bail to the accused, it was stated that some acts of omission and commission on the part of a public servant may attract disciplinary proceedings that may not attract a penal provision.

High Courts

Maharashtra

  • Pushpa D. Sood Vs. Bobcards Limited

The respondent herein had filed a summary suit for recovery of money due on a credit card held by the petitioner. The court allowed the application for leave to defend the suit, however a condition for deposit of 50% of the suit amount was imposed later on.

The petitioner filed an application on the ground that once the application for grant of leave to defend was allowed, it was not open to the court to impose a condition of deposit later on.

The Bombay High Court, dismissed the petition. It was remarked that the order granting leave to defend must show appreciation of material, only the order wherein an exercise of this nature is revealed can be termed as an order granting leave to defend.

  • Dattaram Panchal and others Vs. Nirlon Limited and others

Respondent was engaged in the business of manufacturing and selling yarn and other allied products. The petitioners approached the labour court with the grievance that although they were designated as trainees, they had been discharging the duty of workmen. They had completed 240 days in service and the action of terminating their services without notice was unfair labour practice. The management questioned the jurisdiction of the labour court on the ground that no relationship of employer-employee existed between the parties. Industrial Court upheld the stand the of the management.

The Bombay High Court allowed the petition. It was held that since there is no intervention of a third party, the relationship exists with the respondent alone, the petitioners were directly engaged by the management.

Delhi

  • Cool Desserts Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-II

The appellants are engaged in the business of running an Ice Cream Parlour where they serve ice creams. Ice Creams are purchased in bulk and they were served in the form of various preparations, after adding ingredients such as toppings, nuts, sharbat, sugar syrup etc. The revenue authorities served a notice for payment of excise duty on the ice creams sold, the demand was confirmed by the higher authorities.

An appeal was filed primarily on the grounds that since the products sold by the appellants were not separate and distinct from the ice creams from which they were made, the activities undertaken by them could not be termed as ‘manufacture’ so as to attract imposition of excise duty.

CESTAT, Northern Bench, New Delhi allowed the appeal. It was held that the process of adding toppings etc. did not amount to producing a new commercial commodity.

Andhra Pradesh

  • T. Nirmala and another Vs. Sub Area Commander-A.P., Bollarum, Secunderabad and others

Petitioners are residents of a locality in Secunderabad, they were using a road passing through certain defence area for a long time. A writ petition challenging the action of the Army authorities in not allowing the repair of the road was filed, further, directions were sought to the authorities to allow buses to pass from the said road.

The question for consideration before the High Court was whether long and extensive use of the road would confer any rights in the petitioners qua the right of passage through defence land.

The Andhra Pradesh High Court, dismissed the writ petition, it was held that the petitioners had no vested rights and as such they cannot claim passage through defence land as a matter of right.

Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI)
  • The Telecommunication Tariff (Thirty Fifth Amendment) Order, 2005

Notification No. 310-3(1)/2003-Eco. Dated 31.03.2005: Further amending the Telecommunication Tariff Order, 1999, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India, has brought to the fore The Telecommunication Tariff (Thirty Fifth Amendment) Order, 2005. The amendment intends to make consequential changes in clause 3 under section III of the Telecommunication Tariff Order, 1999, as earlier title of Schedule IV had been changed to “Domestic Leased Circuits” and a new Schedule X, i.e. International Private Leased Circuit (IPLC)-(Half Circuit) was added.

RBI

IDMC
  • Extension of the Scheme of Non-Competitive Bidding Facility to 182-Day Treasury Bills

Circular No. IDMD.No.11/08.12.00/2004-05 Dated 30.03.2005: The Reserve Bank after making due consultation with the Government of India has decided to re-introduce 182-Day Treasury Bills from the fiscal year 2005-06. The first auction of 182-Day Treasury Bills will be conducted on April 6, 2005 and subsequent auctions on a fortnightly basis on Wednesdays preceding the non-Reporting Fridays with payment on non-Reporting Fridays.

Ministry of Commerce & Industry
Industrial Policy and Promotion
  • Conditional Exemption to Units using P-3 Type Nitro-Glycerine based Explosives

Notification No. GSR191(E) Dated 24.03.2005: Receiving representations on behalf of M/s Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Eastern Coalfields Limited and Central Mining Research Institute to the Central Government that P-3 type Nitro-Glycerine based explosives (Belgex Coal-R) are used in the Blasting Gallery method in underground mines and there was no substitute available for P-3 type Nitroglycerine based explosives in the market. Further, production of coal for power generation has been seriously affected in the southern region of the country, due to ban of Nitro-Glycerine based explosives. Therefore, the Central Government has exempted M/s Singareni Collieries Company Limited, Eastern Coalfields Limited, Central Mining Research Institute (CMRI) and units having licence to manufacture P-3 type Nitro-glycerine based explosives (Belgex Coal-R) for possession, transport, use and sale of P-3 type Nitro-glycerine based explosives (Belgex Coal-R). The exemption is subject to certain conditions, as to ceiling of production, production under proper supervision, security while transportation, requirements as regards documentations and disposal of remaining stocks.

Ministry of Finance
CBDT
  • Income-tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2005

Notification No. 122/2005 Dated 30.03.2005: Further amending the Income-tax Rules, 1962, the Central Board of Direct Taxes has by virtue of this notification, brought about the Income-tax (Ninth Amendment) Rules, 2005. The amendments were made in Forms 27A and 27B. These forms are for the purpose of furnishing information with the statement of deduction/collection of tax at source filed on computer media.

  • Electronic Filing of Returns of Tax Collected at Source Scheme, 2005

Notification No. 121/2005 Dated 30.03.2005: The Central Board of Direct Taxes, vide this notification, has specified Electronic Filing of Returns of Tax Collected at Source Scheme, 2005. It shall be applicable to all persons filing returns of tax collected at source on computer media under sub-section (5B) of section 206C of the Income-tax Act, 1961. It consists of methodology for preparation and furnishment of e-TCS Returns. It explicitly makes a mention of the procedure to be followed by e-TCS intermediary and its general responsibilities. It also, declares the powers of the e-filing Administrator and powers of the Board as regard to revocation of the authorisation of an e-filing Intermediary.

  • Income-Tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2005

Notification No. 120/2005 Dated 29.03.2005: The Central Board of Direct Taxes, vide this notification, has made the Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2005, further amending the Income-tax Rules, 1962. These amendments relate to computation of deemed tonnage, and also notified Form No. 66 for submitting Audit Report under clause (ii) of section 115VW of the Income–tax Act, 1961.

Central Excise (Non-Tariff)

  • Central Excise (Second Amendment) Rules, 2005

Notification No. 17/2005-NT Dated 31.03.2005: Further amending the Central Excise Rules, 2002, the Central Government, has vide this notification made the Central Excise (Second Amendment) Rules, 2005, which shall come into force from 1st of April, 2005. The amendments were made in a few rules to bring about substantial changes.

Customs (Non-Tariff)

  • Baggage (Amendment) Rules, 2005

Notification No. 30/2005-NT Dated 04.04.2005: The Central Government, vide this notification, has made the Baggage (Amendment) Rules, 2005, further to amend the Baggage Rules, 1998. Apart from other amendments, it has recognized the land routes, between India and Pakistan, under annexure IV, to be used by the tourists moving between these two countries.

Ministry of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution
Consumer Affairs
  • Bureau of Indian Standards (Appointment, Terms and Conditions of Service of Director General) (Amendment) Rules, 2005

Notification No. GSR217(E) Dated 30.03.2005: Making the Bureau of Indian Standards (Appointment, Terms and Conditions of Service of Director General) (Amendment) Rules, 2005 vide this notification, the Central Government has further amended the Bureau of Indian Standards (Appointment, Terms and Conditions of Service of Director General) Rules, 1987. These amendments relate to the pay and other allowances meant for the post of Director General of the Bureau.

SEBI
Secondary Market Division
  • Extension of Date of Ensuring Compliance with Revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement

Circular No. SEBI/CFD/DIL/CG/1/2005/29/3 Dated 29.03.2005: All Stock Exchanges had been directed to amend the Listing Agreement by replacing the existing Clause 49 of the listing agreement with the revised Clause 49. Also, they were asked to set up a separate monitoring cell with identified personnel to monitor the compliance with the provisions of the revised Clause 49 on corporate governance. Realising that all listed companies and companies desirous of getting listed should achieve best corporate governance status, it was felt that more time should be allowed to them to conform to revised Clause 49 of the listing agreement. Hence, the date for ensuring compliance has been now extended, vide this circular, upto December 31, 2005.

Ministry of Power
  • Distribution of Electricity Licence (Additional Requirements of Capital Adequacy, Creditworthiness and Code of Conduct) Rules, 2005

Notification No. GSR188(E) Dated 23.03.2005: The Central Government, vide this notification, has made the Distribution of Electricity Licence (Additional Requirements of Capital Adequacy, Creditworthiness and Code of Conduct) Rules, 2005, which shall come into effect from 23rd of March, 2005. The rules focuse on additional requirements of capital adequacy, creditworthiness and code of conduct, for grant of licence for distribution of electricity under Sub-section (1) of Section 15 of the Electricity Act, 2003.

International Legal News

Cases

Administrative Law

  • Burlington N. v. Surface Transp. Bd

The decision of the Surface Transportation Board to vacate the rate prescription governing the transportation of coal is reversed where the explanation for disparate treatment of shippers and carriers, bound by the same rate prescription, is arbitrary and capricious.

Labor & Employment Law

  • Cummings v. Future Nissan

In a wrongful termination suit, an arbitration award in favor of defendant-employer is affirmed where plaintiff's claim, that the arbitration clause in her employment agreement should not be enforced, is without merit.

Criminal Law

  • People v. Sumahit

A person who has been found to be a sexually violent predator is precluded from challenging the sufficiency of the evidence that he currently lacks the ability to control his behavior when he refuses to be interviewed by the state's experts with respect to the current status of mental abnormality which forms the basis of his commitment.

Immigration Law

  • Alemu v. Gonzales

Plaintiff's petition for review is denied where the immigration judge's adverse finding that warranted denial of asylum and withholding of removal warrant the denial of Convention Against Torture relief as well.

Contract

  • Power-Tek Solutions Serv. v. Techlink, Inc.

In a breach-of-contract claim, judgment as a matter of law in favor of defendant is affirmed where the disputed agreement was invalid under section 566.1 of the Michigan Compiled Laws since it modified a prior agreement but was neither in writing nor supported by consideration.

Class Action

  • Pioneer Elec. Inc. v. Super. Ct. of L.A. County

When issuing a precertification communication to members of a supposed class, the court must take reasonable steps to assure that consumers receive actual notice of their right to grant or withhold consent of the release of personal information, and that consent for such release must be by the consumer's positive act, rather than by mere failure to respond.

News

  • Insurance Kickback scandal settled

Willis North America Inc., third-largest insurance broker in the US, has agreed to pay $50 million in restitution and to adopt new business practices to settle an investigation into anticompetitive practices involving incentive fees in property and casualty insurance sales. An investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer and New York state's insurance department found Willis steered insurance contracts to companies with which it had fee arrangements. Joe Plumeri, Willis' chairman and chief executive officer, said in a statement that “Willis has resolved this matter with the New York attorney general and the New York insurance superintendent, and we welcome the attorney general's conclusion that it was not appropriate to file a complaint against our company based on the findings of his investigation”

  • First execution in New England in 45 years

In what would be the first execution in New England in 45 years, a serial killer is scheduled to die by lethal injection on the 11th of May this year. He has admitted killing eight young women in Connecticut and New York in the 1980s. The earlier date fixed for execution had to be postponed when doubts surfaced regarding the competency of the convict to decide to forego further appeals and volunteer to be executed. Chief U.S. District Judge Robert N. Chatigny had threatened to go after the law license of the convicts’ attorney if he found that the lawyer, in pressing for a prompt execution, had neglected or ignored evidence that his client was incompetent. A state psychiatrist has said that the convict clearly understands the consequences, he further said that has seen no evidence that convicts’ decision was made out of despair and depression wrought by years of close confinement on death row

  • Spammer sentenced to 9 year imprisonment

In a first of its kind trial, a North Carolina man has been convicted for spamming. He was sentenced to nine years in prison, but the judge postponed the sentence while the case is appealed. The jury recommended the nine year prison term after convicting Jeremy Jaynes of pumping out at least 10 million e-mails a day with the help of 16 high-speed lines, the kind of Internet capacity a 1,000-employee company would need. Jaynes was convicted in November for using false Internet addresses to send mass e-mail ads through an America Online Inc. server in northern Virginia. Under Virginia law, sending unsolicited bulk e-mail itself is not a crime unless senders mask their identities. Prosecutors and the judge said the nine-year sentence was meant to deter others from sending illegal spam

  • Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer take over completed

Sony has obtained access to MGM's library of over 4,000 films, which they plan to use for video-on-demand services and new cable channels. MGM, best known in recent years for the James Bond films, was the last major independent studio in Hollywood. A total of $ 2.9 (£1.5bn) was paid in for acquiring the studio, further outstanding debts were also assumed by Sony. The studio had been formed in 1924 after a merger between Metro Pictures Corporation, Goldwyn Pictures, and Louis B Mayer Productions. The most famous films to come out of MGM include such classics as The Wizard Of Oz and Gone With The Wind. All future films will be co-produced by Sony

  • Pfizer announces withdrawal of Bextra

Pfizer Inc., the world's largest drug maker, has announced that it was removing the arthritis drug Bextra from the market. Following the announcement, Louisiana attorneys for Bextra and Celebrex patients asked today a judicial panel in Washington, D.C. to move all Bextra and Celebrex lawsuits in the country to one federal court, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, which is in New Orleans, for consolidation and management. Bextra was taken off the market because the overall risk versus benefit profile for the drug is "unfavorable," the Food and Drug Administration said in a statement. Bextra was taken off the market because of its potential to cause a rare but serious skin reaction, which is already disclosed on its label, Pfizer said. Some cardiologists have also voiced concerns that Bextra causes increase in the risk of Heart attack, Pfizer Inc. has however denied this.

  • U.S. supreme court judge urges legal professionals to harmonise reason with faith

Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia has urged a blend of reason and faith. He asked members of the legal profession not to write off traditional Christians as simple minded. "Faith with no rational thought is false. What is irrational is to reject (without question) the possibility of miracles," he told more than 300 people at a banquet on the eve of an annual Mass to honor and bless lawyers and people who work with them. The justice, whose nine children include a priest, quoted scripture passages warning that those wise in the world would not accept Christianity.