manupatra roundup

Legislative and Regulatory Update

You now have the option of customizing your manupatra round-up .This means that you get updates on the areas of interest that you select .You may change your preferences at any time you wish to. If you do not customize your round up you will continue to get the updates on all areas

 

To customize your round-up now click here.

_____________________________________________________________________

India Centric Online Legal & Business Database

Bringing forth new efficiency and unparalleled results to research efforts.

In This Issue

[No.84]                                                                            April 30, 2004

International
SEBI
CBDT
CBEC Customs Tariff
RBI
DGFT
Department of Commerce
Ministry of Home Affairs
Department of Consumer Affairs
Ministry of Power
Press Information Bureau
Supreme Court
High Courts

To keep you informed about the latest Legislative and Regulatory information manupatra.com publishes this e-roundup highlighting the recent changes brought about by the Notifications/Acts/Bills /Ordinances etc.

About manupatra.com

../ provides comprehensive and easy to use legal and related information over the Internet .Our database covers Central Laws, Judgments of Supreme Court and High Court (full text of the judgments from 1950 onwards), Orders of Tribunals, Bills, Notifications, Circulars and more

Key features of manupatra are

Content is derived from reliable primary and secondary sources
Database is updated on a daily basis
Electronic Ready Reckoner to view the judgments under a particular section of an Act / Subject
Powerful search engine with user friendly interfaces
Search in any one court/year or multiple courts/year
Hyper-linking of documents

Updated modules on WTO, Anti Dumping, Arbitration, Investment Destinations Abroad, Capital Markets, Taxation, Environment, Cyber & IT Laws, IPR, Corporate Laws, Industrial Policies, Foreign Trade, Forex & Banking and more

 

 

For subscription to manupatra.com or for more details please log onto ../ or call us at 0120 2531811 or send an email to : contact@manupatra.com

If at any stage you wish to stop receiving the e-roundup please click here to unsubscribe.

 

   

International Legal News

Cases

Source: Westlawinternational.com

  • Environmental Law: Local rules did not escape CAA pre-emption simply because they addressed purchase of vehicles

Vacating a decision of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals, the United States Supreme Court held that fleet rules adopted by California's South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) did not escape pre-emption by the Clean Air Act (CAA) simply by virtue of the fact that they addressed the purchase of vehicles, rather than their manufacture or sale. The Supreme Court also remanded the case, indicating that at least certain aspects of the rules appeared to be pre-empted, but that it was appropriate that the lower courts address certain issues in the first instance.

Engine Manufacturers Ass'n v. South Coast Air Quality Management Dist.

  • Family Law: Constitutionality of court's inquiry into relationship between religious organization and child support obligor

The United States Supreme Court has declined to grant certiorari in a case in which a Minnesota appellate court held that the determination whether a religious organization was a child support obligor's employer for child support withholding purposes could be made by applying neutral principles of law, and, accordingly, the trial court's exercise of jurisdiction over the inquiry into the relationship between the organization and its member would not foster excessive governmental entanglement with religion. The appellate court found that the determination could be made without inquiry into the internal decisionmaking and governance of the religious organization.

Christ's Household of Faith v. Rooney

  • Education: Constitutionality of conducting mess hall prayer at state-operated military college -Certiorari Denied

The United States Supreme Court has denied certiorari in a case in which the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals held that a prayer conducted in the campus mess hall of Virginia Military Institute (VMI), a state-operated military college, violated the Establishment Clause. The petition for certiorari presented the question whether a public institution of higher education may include a brief, non-denominational prayer as part of an official event involving an audience of adults, especially where the prayer serves legitimate secular purposes.

Mellen v. Bunting

  • Trademarks: Preemption of state law in intellectual property context-Certiorari Denied

The Supreme Court has denied certiorari in a case arising out of a former licensee and packager's unauthorized use of certification marks registered to the Idaho Potato Commission and the licensing agreement, which prevented the licensee from challenging the validity of the mark during the contract or thereafter. The Commission alleges that the Second Circuit, in allowing the former licensee to proceed with a cancellation claim, abrogated state law rights to enforce a contract, based simply on the balancing of public and private interests, in conflict with the Supreme Court's standards for preempting state law in the intellectual property context as delineated in Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 U.S. 257, 99 S.Ct. 1096, 59 L.Ed.2d 296 (1979), and Lear, Inc. v. Adkins, 395 U.S. 653, 89 S.Ct. 1902, 23 L.Ed.2d 610 (1969), and with the decisions of other courts refusing to preempt state contract law under the Lanham Act.

Idaho Potato Commission v. M & M Produce Farm & Sales

  • Maritime Law: Recognition of tort of negligent misrepresentation as applied to classification societies -- Certiorari Denied.

Certiorari has been denied in a case in which the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, moving into "novel but not entirely unchartered territory," held that general maritime law cautiously recognizes the tort of negligent misrepresentation as applied to classification societies. Classification societies are organized societies which undertake to arrange inspections and advise on the hull and machinery of a vessel from its initial stages in new building and thereafter. The societies produce a certificate concerning the vessel's seaworthiness. The certificates are widely relied upon by all sectors of the maritime industry as an indication that a vessel is reasonably fit for its intended use.

Nippon Kaiji Kyokai Corp. v. Otto Candies, L.L.C.

  • Taxation: Constitutionality of not disclosing findings of special trial judges in cases before Tax Court -- Certiorari Granted.

Granting certiorari in Docket Nos. 03-184 and 03-1034, the Supreme Court has agreed to examine the Tax Court's practice of not making public the report of factual and legal findings made by Special Trial Judges (STJ) assigned by the Tax Court to conduct trials in complicated tax cases. Under the practice, the reports are not disclosed to the taxpayer and are not part of the record on appeals from the Tax Court to the Court of Appeals.

Kanter v. C.I.R.

  • Telecommunications: Remedy for giving improper credits to female and minority bidders for spectrum licenses -- Certiorari Denied.

Denying certiorari, the United States Supreme Court has rejected the challenge of a larger successful bidder to the action of the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in issuing "remedial bidding credits" to all small businesses who won 218-219 MHz spectrum licenses as part of an auction that was tainted by a special bidding credit granted only to minority and female licensees. The tainted credit lowered the price actually paid for licenses by 25% from the minority and female licensees' winning high bids.

Self Communications, Inc. v. F.C.C.

  • Civil Rights: Fault standard applicable to police officers who initiate high- speed chases ending in injury to third-parties -- Certiorari Denied.

Denying certiorari, the United States Supreme Court will not consider an Eighth Circuit decision that officers were entitled to qualified immunity from liability on a substantive due process claim for initiating a high-speed chase that ended when the fleeing suspect's car crashed into another vehicle, causing serious injury and death to the vehicle's occupants.

Slusarchuk v. Hoff

  • Labor and Employment: Burden imposed on white employee claiming reverse race discrimination -- Certiorari Denied.

The United States Supreme Court has denied certiorari in a Title VII reverse race discrimination and Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA) case brought by a city employee who was terminated while on medical leave after he was indicted for mail fraud. The Seventh Circuit held that the first prong of the McDonnell Douglas test is altered in a reverse race discrimination case. Rather than showing he is a member of a minority, the employee must show background circumstances demonstrating that the particular employer "has reason or inclination to discriminate invidiously against whites" or must produce evidence that there is something "fishy" about the facts at hand. The employee failed to meet this burden. With respect to the employee's FMLA claim, the Seventh Circuit held that a termination that was motivated by poor quality of the employee's work did not violate FMLA simply because it occurred while he was on medical leave.

Phelan v. City of Chicago, Illinois

  • Criminal Justice: Terrorist's attorney and others could be charged with providing material support to terrorists.

Charges could be brought against the attorney for an imprisoned terrorist, as well as against the attorney's translator and an associate of the imprisoned terrorist, under the statute criminalizing the provision of material support to terrorists, because their acts of passing messages to and from the imprisoned terrorist constituted providing material support to terrorists. The messages concerned a conspiracy to kill and kidnap persons in a foreign country, and by passing the messages the defendants made the terrorist available as a co- conspirator in the plot.

U.S. v. Sattar

  • Legal Services: A "death penalty" discovery sanction was appropriate in an exceptional case.

Striking the pleadings of a client who sued her former attorneys for legal malpractice was appropriate in a case where the client refused to produce audiotapes she made of conversations between the attorneys and the client that would have proved or disproved her claims, and then later destroyed the tapes. In such an "exceptional" case, the trial court was only required to "consider" the availability of lesser sanctions, and was not required to test every available sanction.

Cire v. Cummings

News

  • U.S. and Canadian Clearance Received For Proposed Acquisition By The Circuit City

Circuit City Stores, Inc. (NYSE: CC - News) declared that it has received Canadian antitrust clearance for its proposed acquisition of InterTAN, Inc. (NYSE: ITN - News). It further informed that the U.S. Federal Trade Commission has determined that the transaction is not subject to premerger antitrust review under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976. The completion of the transaction remains subject to satisfaction of other conditions, including at least a majority of the fully diluted InterTAN shares being tendered into the offer.

  • EU Antitrust Regulators To Gain Enforcement Freedom

European Union regulators will gain new powers and have more freedom to concentrate on big international mergers and antitrust cases once the EU expands to 25 countries which is expected to happen in a short span. The moves, considered as the first major changes in EU antitrust rules in 40 years, are expected to open the door to U.S.-style private lawsuits against companies accused of anticompetitive practices. They will also allow EU Competition Commissioner Mario Monti and a yet-unnamed successor expected to take his place in the fall to hand off more of their lesser reviews to national regulators, decentralizing EU enforcement as the union expands.

  • Oracle Becomes Member Of Group Critical of Antitrust Law

Oracle Corp., joins the trade group which defended Microsoft in its landmark antitrust trial. It is fighting the U.S. government over its proposed $9.4 billion takeover of rival PeopleSoft Inc. A suit has been filed by the Justice Department to block Oracle's hostile takeover of PeopleSoft on antitrust grounds, charging it would eliminate one of only three players in the market for software sold to large business customers to manage finances, human resources, sales forces and other functions.

  • Smoking in Car with Kids To Be Banned By California Bill

California could become the first U.S. state to outlaw smoking in cars or trucks that have children inside after the passing of a bill which is being considered in the state Assembly to allow police to stop vehicles if a minor appears to be exposed to smoke from a pipe, cigar, cigarette, or "any other plant." The bill already has the support of the American Lung Association, which points to research showing secondhand smoke can cause cancer, respiratory infections and asthma.

  • Iran's Hard-line Judiciary Bans Use of Torture

Iran's judiciary known for its hardline principles ordered a ban on the use of torture which human rights groups say the Islamic Republic's security organizations routinely use to extract confessions. Although Iran's constitution specifically outlaws the use of torture of detainees, however, several attempts by the reformist-dominated parliament to pass a bill banning torture have been blocked by a constitutional watchdog run by religious hard-liners.

  • U.S. To Pay $600 Million Under Iran Court’s Order

Under an Iranian court’s order United States has been asked to pay $600 million in compensation for supplying ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein with chemical weapons. It further ordered that the money in the case, brought by Iranian war veterans and disabled, should be paid to survivors of attacks on the town of Sardasht which borders Iraq. Iraqi gas attacks killed thousands of Iranians and Iraqi Kurds in the 1980-1988 Iran-Iraq war. Hundreds of thousands died on both sides and Iran has thousands disabled by chemical arms.

  • New Overtime Rules Defended By Bush Administration

The Bush administration defended its new overtime rules for white-collar workers against Democratic-led charges the regulations could cost millions of employees overtime pay. This has come in the wake of election-year pressure as it is expected to guarantee overtime protection for more workers and take it from less than it had initially proposed last year. The administration has estimated that about 107,000 workers will lose overtime protection, all of them now earning more than $100,000.

  • NYPD Ordered to Review Whistleblower Case

A judge while hearing a pension dispute sided with a detective, Baird, who said that he was driven off the police force by anonymous threats and hate mail because he exposed NYPD corruption. The judge said that the detective should be lauded for his courage rather than destroyed by the system whose integrity he sought to preserve. During the early 1990s, Baird informed a special commission about cover-ups within the internal affairs division, where he worked. Using a code name, he produced documents and witnesses to show that the division hid cases that might embarrass the department.

  • S.C. Takes A Tough Stand On Internet Child Predators

State law enforcement finally has a law that can be used to prosecute Internet child predators before any physical contact takes place. The law mandates a 10-year sentence for each offense, which Attorney General Henry McMaster said can multiply if there are several online contacts before an arrest. South Carolina is joining 29 other states by making it illegal to stalk, lure or entice a minor for abduction or sexual assault.

  • Jury Award Tops $1 Billion in Wyeth Case

An amount of $1 billion has been awarded by the Texas Jury to the family of a woman who died after using one of the drugs in the fen-phen diet drug regimen. However, the company said there is a strong basis to overturn the ruling in the District Court of Jefferson County, Texas, based on "legal errors made during the trial and in the charge to the jury." The jury verdict represents a setback to Wyeth, which has already taken $16.6 billion in charges for past and future payments to the to six-million Americans who took Fen-phen, a diet drug combination that paired Pondimin or another Wyeth drug called Redux with phentermine.

SEBI

Primary Market Division

  • Issue of Digitally Signed Circular for Amendments to the SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) {DIP} Guidelines, 2000

Circular No. SEBI/CFD/DIL/MB/2004/22/4 Dated 22.04.2004 : It has been cleared that circulars pertaining to amendments to SEBI (Disclosure and Investor Protection) Guidelines, 2000 would henceforth be issued only in electronic form with digital signatures in conformity with the information Technology Act, 2000 and that physical dispatch of circulars would be discontinued.

Secondary Market Division

  • Detailed System Flow for Mandatory Use of STP System for All Institutional Trades Executed on the Stock Exchanges

Circular No SEBI/DNPD/Cir-23/04 Dated 27.04.2004 : The present circular has been released in continuation of the circular no. DNPD/Cir-22/2004 dated April 1, 2004 which was mandating the the use of the Straight Through Processing (STP) System for all institutional trades w.e.f. July 1, 2004. This circular contains the detailed system flow of the STP framework. It is required that a STP user intending to send an instruction would send the message to his STP service provider after digitally signing the same and the same should be verified by STP service provider and forward it to the recipient STP user. A diagram to this has also been provided.

  • Settlement of Transactions in the Case of Holidays

Circular No. SEBI/MRD/Policy/AT/Cir-19/2004 Dated 21.04.2004 : With a view to facilitate the smooth completion of settlement process and help members of the Stock Exchanges meet their obligations in a timely manner under circumstances where there is lack of uniformity of holidays, the Stock Exchanges/Depositories are advised to follow the guidelines and adhere to the time line laid down in this circular. These guidelines are based on the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Derivatives and Market Risk Management (RMG) and have been finalised in consultation with the Stock Exchanges and the Depositories. According to the guideines :-

1. The Stock Exchanges shall clear and settle the trades on a sequential basis

2. The cash/Securities pay out from the first settlement shall be made available to the member for meeting his pay-in obligations for the subsequent settlement/s

3. Further, in-order to meet his pay-in obligations for the subsequent settlement, the member may need to move securities from one depository to another.

4. The Stock Exchanges/Depositories shall follow a strict time schedule to ensure that the settlements are completed on the same day

5. The Clearing Corporation/Clearing House of the Stock Exchanges shall execute Auto DO facility for all the settlements together

  • Renewal of Recognition to Ludhiana Stock Exchange Association Limited

Notification No. SO524(E) Dated 20.04.2004 : SEBI has granted renewal of recognition The Ludhiana Stock Exchange Association Limited for a period of one year commencing on the 28th day of April, 2004 and ending on the 27th day of April, 2005 in respect of contracts in securities subject to the condition that the said Exchange shall comply with the advice of SEBI communicated vide letter No. MRD/DSA/LSE/7831/04 dated April 20, 2004, within a period of three months from the date of this notification i.e. 20.04.2004.

  • Renewal of Recognition to Gauhati Stock Exchange Limited

Notification No. SO523(E) Dated 20.04.2004 : SEBI has granted renewal of recognition The Gauhati Stock Exchange Limited for a period of one year commencing on the 1 st day of May, 2004 and ending on the 30th day of April, 2005 in respect of contracts in securities subject to-the condition that the said Exchange shall commence trading only after obtaining final approval from SEBI for establishment of the Settlement Guarantee Fund and the said Exchange shall comply with the observations made in Report on the inspection of the said Exchange conducted by the SEBI during the period March, 23-24, 2004 and communicated to the said Exchange vide letter No. SEBI/ERO/BNS/2004/7382 dated April 8, 2004.

Press Release

  • Constitution of High Level Task Force

Press Release No. PR No.92/2004 Dated 23.04.2004 : A High level task force named Securities Markets Infrastructure Leveraging Expert Task Force (SMILE Task Force) has been constituted by SEBI under the chairmanship of Dr P J Nayak, Chairman and MD of UTI Bank. The SMILE Task Force is constituted to carry out a thorough 'health check' on the Securities markets infrastructure encompassing all segments of the markets (viz. equities, debt, derivatives, fund products) and covering all market participants such as exchanges, trading platforms, clearing and settlement systems, payment systems, depositories, issue houses (registrars) and other intermediaries.

CBDT

  • Income-tax (Eighth Amendment) Rules, 2004

Notification No. 142/2004 Dated 20.04.2004 : In the Income Tax Rules 1962 a new rule 18DC has been inserted prescribing the area, facilities and amenities for convention centres and particulars of audit report for claiming deduction u/s 80 IB(7B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Through amendment a new Form No. 10CCBB has also been introduced which is to be used, in case of convention centres, for filing of report of audit along with the return of income.

These amendments have been brought into effect retrospectively from 01.04.2002.

CBEC Customs Tariff

  • Directions of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India dated 14.10.2003 in the Matter of WP No. 657/95

Circular No. 31/2004 Dated 26.04.2004 : The attention has been diverted to the judgement dated 4.10.2003 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in WP No. 657 of 1995 in Research Foundation for Science Technology and National Resource Policy vs. Union of India relating to import of hazardous wastes. In this judgement directions had been issued regarding prohibition on import of the hazardous wastes.

  • Anti Dumping Cases

Notification No. 57/2004 Dated 20.04.2004 : Anti Dumping Duty has been imposed on Oxo-Alcohols originating in, or exported from Poland, South Korea, Indonesia, Saudi Arabia, Russia, Iran, USA and EU. The anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be levied for a period of five years with effect from the date of Imposition of provisional anti-dumping duty, i.e. the 27th day of January, 2000, and shall be paid in Indian currency.

Notification No. 55/2004 Dated 19.04.2004 : Anti Dumping Duty has been imposed on Plastic Ophthalmic Lenses originating in, or exported from China RP and Chinese Taipei. The anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be levied with effect from the date of imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty, i.e. the 5th September, 2003, and shall be paid in Indian currency.

Notification No. 54/2004 Dated 19.04.2004 : Anti Dumping Duty has been imposed on Titanium dioxide originating in, or exported from China RP. The anti-dumping duty imposed under this notification shall be levied with effect from the date of imposition of the provisional anti-dumping duty, i.e. the 11th July, 2003, and shall be paid in Indian currency.

RBI

  • Foreign Exchange Management (Deposit) Regulations, 2000 - Acceptance of Deposits - Revised Guidelines

Circular No. A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 89 Dated 24.04.2004 : The issue relating to acceptance of deposits from NRIs by persons other than Authorised Dealers/Authorised Banks has been reviewed in the light of current developments. It has been decided that deposits by NRIs with persons other than Authorised Dealers/Authorised Banks by debit to NRO Accounts may continue as hitherto provided that the amount deposited with such entities does not represent inward remittances or transfer from NRE/FCNR(B) Accounts into the NRO account. Deposits by NRIs with persons other than Authorised Dealers/Authorised Banks out of inward remittances from overseas or by debit to NRE/FCNR (B) Accounts shall henceforth not be permissible. All persons other than Authorised Dealers/Authorised Banks may continue to hold and renew existing deposits held in their books in the name of NRIs on repatriation or non-repatriation basis, as the case may be. The interest earned on such deposits will continue to be eligible for repatriation.

  • Deferred Payment Protocols Dated 30th April 1981 and 23rd December 1985 between the Government of India and erstwhile USSR

Circular No. A.P.(DIR Series) Circular No. 88 Dated 22.04.2004 : The rupee value of the special currency basket has been revised and fixed at Rs. 56.8476 with effect from April 02, 2004. It was earlier indicated as Rs.59.3395 effective from January 01, 2004.

  • Declaration of Dividends by Banks

Notification No. DBOD.NO.BP.BC.80/ 21.02.067/2003-04 Dated 23.04.2004 : The policy approach adopted by the Reserve Bank with regard to payment of dividends by banks has been recently reviewed in consultation with the Standing Technical Advisory Committee on Financial Regulation (STACFR) and it has been decided that the regulatory focus with regard to payment of dividend by banks should shift from 'quantum of dividend' to 'dividend payout ratio'. According to the revised guidelines on dividends payable by banks:-

Only the Banks, having the CRAR of at least 11 % for preceding two completed years and the accounting year for which it proposes to declare dividend and

Net NPA less than 3 %, shall be eligible to declare dividends without prior approval of RBI. In case any bank does not meet the criteria prescribed in it should obtain the prior approval of the Reserve Bank before declaring any dividend.

  • Relaxation to Trade and Industry In the State of Jammu and Kashmir

Notification No. DBOD.BP.BC.77 /21.04.012/ 2003-04 Dated 21.04.2004 : With a view to ensuring larger flow of credit to trade and industry in the State of Jammu and Kashmir on the one hand and bringing about appropriate changes in the monitoring mechanism on the other,a comprehensive package of concessions / relaxations is recommended for immediate implementation by banks operating in the State of Jammu and Kashmir. The concessions / credit relaxations to borrowers / customers in the State of Jammu & Kashmir will be operative for a further period of one year, i.e., up to 31st March 2005. The main concessions or relaxations provided under the package are:-

1. Increased working capital facilities may be sanctioned by the bank depending on the merits of each case

2. Finance against accepted hundies (Usance bills) should be encouraged

3. The banks may honour small Fixed Deposit Receipts, say up to Rs.10,000/- of the Kashmiri migrants at the designated branches without verifying details from the branch of origin against indemnity bond, where necessary.

4. Concessions may be given in service tariffs for remittances. The same may also be extended to collection of outstation bills/cheques.

  • Interest Rates on Deposits under Non Resident (External) Rupee Account (NRE Accounts)

Notification No. DBOD. No. Dir. BC.76/13.01.09/2003-04 Dated 17.04.2004 : The interest rates on NRE Deposits for one to three years maturity, contracted effective close of business in India on April 17, 2004, should not exceed the LIBOR/SWAP rates for US dollar of corresponding maturity.

With a view to aligning interest rates on various categories of NRE deposits, it has been decided to link the interest rate on NRE savings deposits also to LIBOR/SWAP rates with effect from close of business in India on April 17, 2004. The interest rates on NRE savings deposits should not exceed the LIBOR/SWAP rate for six months maturity on US dollar deposits and may be fixed quarterly on the basis of the LIBOR/SWAP rate of US dollar on the last working day of the preceding quarter. For the quarter April-June 2004, the US dollar LIBOR/SWAP rate as on the last working day of March 2004 would be applicable.

It has been clarified that since the account holder of NRE savings deposits can withdraw savings deposits at any time, banks should not mark any type of lien, direct or indirect, against these deposits

  • Non-Banking Financial Companies, Miscellaneous Non-Banking Companies and Residuary Non-Banking Companies - Interest Rate on NRI deposits

Notification No. DNBS (PD) CC. No. 36 / 02.01 / 2003-04 04 Dated 20.04.2004 : RBI has revised the interest rate payable on the NRE deposits accepted by scheduled commercial banks and it has been decided that the rate of interest on these deposits should not exceed the LIBOR / SWAP rates for US dollar of corresponding maturity. Accordingly, it has been advised that the rate of interest on the NRI deposits payable by NBFCs, MNBCs and RNBCs shall not exceed the LIBOR/SWAP rates for US dollar of corresponding maturity on fresh deposits contracted from the close of business on April 17, 2004. The maturity period of repatriable NRI deposits would continue to be one to three years. The change in interest rate will also apply to repatriable NRI deposits renewed after their present maturity period.

  • Sale of Government Securities Allotted in the Auctions for Primary Issues on the Same Day

Circular No. BPD.PCB.Cir 44 /09.29.00/2003-04 Dated 12.04.2004 : Currently, Government Securities and Treasury Bills are permitted to be traded only on T+0 or T+1 settlement basis, unless they are traded on the Stock Exchanges. Therefore it has been clarified that, any sale of securities allotted in primary auctions, in terms of the above circular, should be only on a T+0 or T+1 settlement basis.

  • Government of India Announces the Sale (Re-Issue) of Dated Security under Market Stabilisation Scheme Through Price Based Auction

Press Release No. 2003-2004/1258 Dated 23.04.2004 : The Government of India had announced the sale (re-issue) of "6.18 percent Government Stock 2005" under Market Stabilisation Scheme for a notified amount of Rs.5,000 crore through a price based auction using multiple price auction method. The auction has been conducted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) at Mumbai on Tuesday, April 27, 2004. Up to 5 per cent of the notified amount of the sale of the stock will be allotted to eligible individuals and institutions as per the Scheme for Non-Competitive Bidding Facility in the Auction of Government Securities.

DGFT

  • Amendments in Handbook of Procedures (Vol. I)

Public Notice No. 61 (RE-2003)/2002-07 Dated 21.04.2004 : An amendment has been made in Appendix 28A by adding an agency to the "List of IS/ISO 9000 (series) Certification agency". The agency added is 31. Germanischer Lloyd Certification GmbH, Vorsetzen 32 D-20457, Hamburg, Germany and its authorized representative in India M/s Germanischer Lloyd Industrial Services India Pvt Ltd, New No 9, Balaji Avenue, IInd St, T. Nagar, Chennai 600 017.

Department of Commerce

  • Anti Dumping Case

Notification No. 14/26/2002-DGAD Dated 20.04.2004 : New Shipper Review of Anti-dumping Duty Imposed on Imports of Lead Acid Batteries Requested by M/s. CSB Battery Guangzhou Co. Ltd. China PR--Final Findings.

Ministry of Home Affairs
  • Citizenship (Amendment) Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR168(E) Dated 28.02.2004 : Amendment of the Citizenship Rules, 1956 in their application to the States of Gujarat and Rajasthan has been made. The amendments made in Citizenship Rules, 1956, shall, in their application to the States of Gujarat and Rajasthan, have effect, for a period of one year from the date of their commencement. According to the amendments Rules 8A has been inserted prescribing the Authority to register as Citizens in States of Gujarat and Rajasthan. Apart from that Rule 9A has also been inserted which prescribes the forms to be submitted to the Collectors of districts of Gujarat and Rajasthan. Also, Rule 11A and 12A, regarding maintenance of register of persons of districts of Gujarat and Rajasthan, have also been inserted.

All the amendments have been made effective from 01.03.2004.

Department of Consumer Affairs

  • Permission Granted to Manufacture the Specified non-Standard Weights

Order No. SO496(E) Dated 13.04.2004 : The Central Government has permitted M/s, Weigh India, Plot No. 137, Functional Industrial Estate, Patparganj, New Delhi-110092, to manufacture some non-standard weights viz. 50, 25, 10, 5, 2, 1 pounds each exclusively for supply to Indian Airlines; Airport Terminal-11, New Delhi-37 for their scientific investigation purposes within a period of one year from the date of publication of this Order in the Official Gazette i.e 13.04.2004.

Ministry of Power
  • Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Form, Verification and the Fee for Filling an Appeal) Rules, 2004

Notification No. GSR260(E) Dated 13.04.2004 : The Central Government has framed the, namely Appellate Tribunal for Electricity (Form, Verification and the Fee for Filling an Appeal) Rules, 2004 in order to operationalise the various aspects of filing the appeal to the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity u/s 111 of the Electricity Act, 2003. These rules provides the format of the form through which appeal can be filed. The amount of fees has also been mentioned which is to be filed along while filing the appeal. It is Rs 10000/- where the respondents are less than four and where respondents are four or more the said fee shall be increased by rupees fifty per respondent.

These rules have been made effective from 13.04.2004.

Press Information Bureau
  • BIS Grants Quality Systems Certificate to Dgft

Dated 26.04.2004 : The Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS) has granted the quality systems Certification licence for ISO 9001:2000 to the Headquarters office of Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT). ISO 9001 specifies requirements for a Quality Management System where an Organisation needs to demonstrate its ability to provide products that fulfil customer and applicable regulatory requirements and aims to enhance customer satisfaction. The licence was granted to DGFT after the mandatory audit conducted by an Expert Team of Auditors from Bureau of Indian Standards.

  • Jaitley Approves 11 Cases Of Foreign Technology Collaboration/Franchise Agreements

Dated 26.04.2004 : Shri Arun Jaitley, Union Minister of Commerce and Industry has approved 11 cases of foreign technology collaboration/franchise agreements and 8 cases for grant of industrial licence. The Project Approval Board and the Licensing Committee in its meeting held on 20.4.2004, under the chairmanship of Shri Lakshmi Chand, Secretary, Department of Industrial Policy & Promotion had recommended these cases for approval. The approved proposals include foreign technical collaboration of M/s Hotel Yamunaview Ltd., for a franchise and management consultancy agreement with M/s Radisson Hotels International Inc., USA, and the technical collaboration of M/s Mitsuba Sical India Ltd with M/s Mitsuba Corporation, Japan for production of AC Generators.

Supreme Court
  • Punjab and Sind Bank and Anr. Vs. S. Ranveer Singh Bawa and Anr.

The question that arose for consideration in this case was whether the respondent who earlier opted for voluntary retirement scheme could be permitted to withdraw therefrom after having received the payments under the scheme?

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that the respondent had two savings bank accounts. He had withdrawn his option of VRS on 22.12.2000 and yet without any objection he received three credits in his account on three subsequent dates on account of salary (including notice pay). Thereafter, he repayed his car loan; invested Rs. 30,000/- in PPF and Rs. 1,42,406.40 in fixed deposit for three years, which was a long term investment. Therefore, the principles of estoppel applied to the facts therein which states that one who knowingly accepts the benefit of a contract is estopped from denying the binding effect on him of such contract. The conduct of respondent indicated his knowledge about payments in his accounts; that he never objected to such payments and that he had appropriated the amounts for his benefit. Therefore, he could not resile from the scheme. Hence, the appeal was allowed.

  • New Moga Transport Company, through its Proprietor Krishanlal Jhanwar Vs. United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Ors.

In the appeal, the only question that was raised was whether the High Court's conclusion that the Civil Court at Barnala had jurisdiction to try the suit filed by respondent United India Insurance Co. Ltd. and Malwa Cotton Spinning Mills Ltd. was correct or not. While the trial Court held that the Barnala Court had jurisdiction, the first Appellate Court held otherwise. Accepting the revision filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the 'CPC') the High Court by the impugned judgment held that the trial Court's view was correct.

The plaintiff had purchased certain articles which were booked with New Moga Transport Co. for transportation to Barnala. The consignment reached Barnala. On account of a fire which took place allegedly due to electric short- circuiting there was destruction of whole of the materials. A claim was lodged against the defendant for the loss suffered. In the suit a specific plea inter alia was taken by the appellant that the Court at Barnala had no jurisdiction to deal with the suit. With reference to the consignment note, it was submitted that the Court at Udaipur alone had jurisdiction to deal with the matter as it was indicated therein that the Court having jurisdiction was the one situated at Udaipur.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court held that the intention of the parties can be culled out from use of the expressions "only", "alone", "exclusive" and the like with reference to a particular Court. But the intention to exclude a Court's jurisdiction should be reflected in clear, unambiguous, explicit and specific terms. In such case only the accepted notions of contract would bind the parties. Hence, the first Appellate Court was justified in holding that it is only the Court at Udaipur which had jurisdiction to try the suit. The High Court did not keep the relevant aspects in view while reversing the judgment of the trial Court. Accordingly, the judgment of the High Court was set aside.

  • Ramesh Mehta Vs. Sanwal Chand Singhvi and Ors.

The question raised in the civil appeals was whether in counting "the whole number of members of the municipal board" in terms of rule 3(9) of the Rajasthan Municipalities (Motion of No-Confidence against Chairman/Vice-Chairman) Rules 1974, nominated members have to be taken into consideration?

Elections were held for the Municipal Board. The appellant was elected as Chairperson of the Municipal Board. The State Government nominated two members on the Board. On a particular date, the total number of members of the municipal board consisted of 20 elected members, 2 nominated members and one MLA (Ex-officio). Thus, the total number of members were 23. On that day, the no confidence motion was moved against the Chairperson, in which 15 members voted for the motion. The motion was conducted by the SDO. According to the SDO, the no confidence motion stood carried out as the whole number of members on the board, excluding the nominated members, was 21 and 2/3rd of 21 was 14, against which 15 members voted for the motion. According to the appellant, the decision of SDO was erroneous as the whole number of members of the board was 23 and not 21 as determined by the SDO and 2/3rd of 23 being 15.33, the motion stood defeated.

The Hon’ble Supreme Court observed that Article 243R(2)(a)(i) of the Constitution allowed the legislature of a State to appoint any person as a member of the board who had special knowledge in the field of municipal administration, however, the proviso appended to the said Article precluded persons nominated under sub-clause (i) from having a right to vote in the meetings of the municipality. The Constitution, therefore, made a distinction between elected members and nominated members who play essentially an advisory role. Pursuant to the 74th Constitutional amendment of 1994 only elected members and members of the legislative assembly had a right to vote under section 9(1) of the Act. Therefore, the scheme of post 1994 Act was that the chairman/vice-chairman would be elected by the elected members of the boards and their office would stand vacated on passing of no confidence motion by the elected members of the board. The Court thus held that the position which finally emerged was that both before and after 1994, the no-confidence motion had to be voted upon only by members who were entitled to vote.

High Courts
Delhi
  • Smt. Kalawati, Lal Chand Gupta and Shiv General Finance (P) Ltd.Vs. Union of India (UOI) and Ors.

The writ petition was filed by the petitioner, challenging the order passed by Land Acquisition Collector and seeking mandamus against the respondent to pay her the enhanced amount of compensation as given to her co-sharer. The question of law which was required to be determined whether the respondents can discriminate the land owners/Co-owners in the matter of payment of compensation under the Land Acquisition` in respect of same land of same village acquired under the same notification and same Award.

The court held if co-owner of land got enhanced compensation in appeal, the other co-owner would be entitled to same treatment even if he had not preferred appeal, on the first principles of law that one co-owner is entitled to have the benefit of the enhanced compensation given in respect of other co-owners of the land acquired, which belonged to all of them, jointly.

  • Shri Fateh Singh Vs. Union of India (UOI)

This appeal was directed against the judgment passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Delhi, answering a reference under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and dismissing the claim of the petitioner for enhancement of compensation in respect of his acquired land.

The court held that the learned Additional Session Judge has erred in not enhancing the compensation and he had not considered the market value of the land recorded in the mutation record. The court further held that the market value of the appellant's land would be Rs 2,500/-, the same rate as decided in the case of Dalip Singh Vs. Union of India wherein the land of the same village acquired by means of the same Notification, this Court had already approved the market value of the land @ Rs.2,500/- per bigha.

SEBI

  • In Re: Govind Rubber Limited

Govind Rubber Ltd as per revival package approved by the CDR proposed to convert part of the simple interest dues to the institutions into equity shares capital and also the amount of Rs. 8 Crores lying with the company as share application money from the promoters, their relatives, associate companies etc into equity share capital and issue equity shares to the acquirers. Accordingly, Company passed a resolution in the annual general meeting of the company for which relevant disclosures had been made in the explanatory statement under Section 173 (2) of the Companies Act to the shareholders along with notice and interested parties abstained from voting on the resolution. MD of the target company submitted an application to the SEBI seeking exemption from complying with the provisions of regulation 11 of SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997.

SEBI held that proposed acquisition of shares by the acquirers would not result in change in control over the target company and the proposed allotment of shares to the promoters and their relatives group/ associate companies was in pursuance to a package approved by financial institutions and banks under Corporate Debt Restructuring mechanism for revival of the company and would not adversely affect the interest of minority shareholders. SEBI granted exemption to the acquirers from complying with the provisions of Regulation 11 of the SEBI (Substantial Acquisition of Shares and Takeovers) Regulations, 1997 with regard to the proposed acquisition of shares and voting rights of the company in the larger interest of the shareholders of the company.